If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied...

Terroristic threats

No freedom is absolute.

False advertising

Child pornography

And much, much more.

If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.

Could humans be selectively bred, like dogs, to create 2 subspecies that can no longer have offspring? Do I not understand selective breeding properly? Im not worried about the moral implications, just the science please.

HIPAA violations

Threats of violence

Insider trading

Nutritionists reveal the surprising health benefits of maple syrup, including less belly fat - Earth.com

Revealing classified information

Conspiracy

Freedom of speech does not apply to:

Dejected Joshua Kimmich reacts to Germany’s Nations League defeat - Bavarian Football Works

Insurrection

Perjury

Fraud

Will MAGATS boycott Taylor Swift now that she and Travis are supporting Harris?

Revenge porn

You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.

Cal Raleigh’s latest home run sets multiple records - Seattle Sports

Trade secrets

You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?

Read also: